Maximilian Figl vs Luis Garcia Paez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Sep at 11:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Figl vs L. Garcia Paez

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Figl 1 - 0 Paez
They have played 2 sets in total, with Maximilian Figl winning 2 and Luis Garcia Paez winning 0. The last match between Maximilian Figl and Luis Garcia Paez was at the M15 Melilla, 16-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Maximilian Figl getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Figl | 1 |
| Paez | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Melilla(09-16-25)
M. Figl vs L. G. Paez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.99% (103-99) | Career Total W/L | 57.84% (59-43) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Figl vs L. G. Paez Match Preview:
- Second serve effectiveness in the last six months: Paez wins 40.45% of points on second serves, while Figl leads with 45.96%. This element is crucial in determining potential match outcomes.
- Return game strength: Paez has been winning 48.53% of points on opponents' second serves recently, surpassing Figl's 42.5%. For first serve returns, Paez also exceeds Figl with 32.12% compared to 28.74%.
- Under pressure, Paez saves 47.22% of breakpoints, but Figl is more resilient with a 55.16% save rate. Could this indicate an edge in pressure situations?
- Annual match win rate comparison: Paez holds a 57.14% win rate, slightly below Figl’s 58.97% over the last year. Who stands out in this comparison?
- Surface preferences: Paez excels on hard surfaces with a 58% winning rate, whereas Figl performs best on clay at 53%. Potential surface impacts could influence the outcome.
- Competitive level: Both players predominantly compete at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with similar win percentages—Paez at 57.14% and Figl at 58.97%.
- Quality of opposition: Paez faces opponents with an average rank of 158.32, higher compared to Figl's opponents at an average rank of 211.69, providing context on their performance level.
- Deciding set performance rates: Paez's success in deciding sets is 45%, marginally better than Figl's 43%. Could this imply an advantage in tight matches?
- During breakpoint opportunities, Paez converts 29% while Figl does slightly better at 30.95%, a vital metric for live betting scenarios.
Editorial Prediction (September 15, 2025, UTC):
Both players display a variety of strengths and weaknesses that could influence the match outcome. Paez demonstrates proficiency in return games, especially on opponents' second serves, which could play a pivotal role. Additionally, Paez faces tougher opponents on average, hinting at richer experience against stronger competition.
Conversely, Figl excels under pressure by saving more breakpoints and performs slightly better in second serve points. This resilience might be an advantage in high-pressure scenarios.
With Paez's slightly higher performance in deciding sets and better returns, he seems to have a marginal edge in this matchup. Thus, considering these elements, Paez is favored to win this upcoming tennis match.
Maximilian Figl vs Luis Garcia Paez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Figl vs L. G. Paez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Figl Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 4-1 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | ||
L. G. Paez Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 2-6 6-2 10-8 | ||

M. Figl vs L. G. Paez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.99% (103/99) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.84% (59/43) |
| 53.08% (241/213) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.88% (124/94) |
| 51.46% (2250/2122) | Games Win/Loss | 52.02% (1081/997) |
| 39.39% (13/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.61% (20/13) |
| 53.66% (88/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.52% (39/30) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 169 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 286 | Total Double Faults | 82 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 227.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 151.69 |
| 64% (3755/5854) | 1st Serve % | 57% (1137/1988) |
| 61% (2293/3755) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (630/1137) |
| 48% (1001/2099) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (380/851) |
| 43% (264/607) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (73/202) |
| 41% (2342/5758) | Return Points Win % | 40% (787/1973) |
| 50.99% (103/99) | Futures W/L | 57.84% (59/43) |
| 52% (102/196) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (55/98) |
| 57% (24/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 70% (16/23) |
| 38% (21/56) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 86% (107/92) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (60/56) |
| 13% (107/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (60/4) |
| 13% (95/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (42/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kamilla Rakhimova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 6th December 2025 Best Bets

Open In Arte Angers Loire – Angers Preview And Prediction: Tamara Korpatsch vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Betting Tips & Picks December 6, 2025

Alycia Parks vs Tamara Korpatsch Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 5th December 2025 Best Bets

Panna Udvardy vs Despina Papamichail Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 5th December 2025 Best Bets

Dominika Salkova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 5th December 2025 Best Bets
